Re Harmer (HR) Ltd

A founder who ran a family company as his own business, disregarding the wishes of the other shareholders and the board, was oppressing them, and was ordered to give up control.

Citation
[1959] 1 WLR 62
Court
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year
1959
Subject
Company Law
Topic
Unfair prejudice and just and equitable winding up

Facts

Mr Harmer, aged 88, had founded a business dealing in stamps, which he later converted into a company. His sons held most of the shares, but Mr Harmer had the voting control. He ran the company as if it were still his own business, ignoring the decisions of the board, opening a branch in Australia against the board's wishes, dismissing staff and spending the company's money as he pleased. The sons petitioned for relief from oppression.

Legal principle

The Court of Appeal upheld an order for relief. Mr Harmer's conduct was oppressive, because he had disregarded the wishes of the board and the other shareholders, and had run the company in his own interests, as if he were the sole owner. The court ordered that he should not interfere in the company's affairs, and that he should be appointed president for life without any duties or powers. The case was decided under the oppression remedy in section 210 of the Companies Act 1948, which was later replaced by the unfair prejudice remedy.

Related cases on unfair prejudice and just and equitable winding up

Studying company law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions