R v Y

The interests of justice gateway in section 114(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 can be used to admit an out of court confession by one defendant against a co-accused, though it should be used with caution.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Crim 10
Court
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Year
2008
Subject
Evidence
Topic
Hearsay

Facts

Y and X were charged with murder. X had made a statement to a friend, admitting the killing and implicating Y. X did not give evidence at trial, and the prosecution sought to rely on his statement against Y, under the interests of justice gateway in section 114(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. The judge ruled that the statement could not be admitted against Y, because at common law a confession was evidence only against its maker, and the prosecution appealed.

Legal principle

The Court of Appeal allowed the prosecution's appeal. Hughes LJ said that section 114(1)(d) was not limited to evidence favourable to the defence, and that it was capable of applying to a statement by one defendant implicating another, even though such a statement was not admissible at common law. However, the gateway should be applied with caution, and the judge must consider all the factors in section 114(2), including the reliability of the statement and the circumstances in which it was made, together with the general discretion to exclude evidence which would make the trial unfair.

Related cases on hearsay

Studying evidence? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions