Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues (Scottish Independence Referendum Bill)

The Scottish Parliament has no power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence without the agreement of the UK Parliament.

Citation
[2022] UKSC 31
Court
UK Supreme Court
Year
2022
Subject
Public Law
Topic
Conventions, ministers and devolution

Facts

The Scottish Government wanted to hold a second referendum on whether Scotland should become an independent country, after the first referendum in 2014, which had been held with the agreement of the UK Government under an Order made under the Scotland Act 1998. The UK Government refused to agree to a second referendum. The Lord Advocate referred to the Supreme Court the question of whether a draft Scottish Independence Referendum Bill, which would provide for an advisory referendum, would relate to the reserved matters of the Union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England and the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Legal principle

The Supreme Court held unanimously that the proposed Bill would relate to reserved matters, so the Scottish Parliament had no power to legislate for the referendum. Although the referendum would be advisory and have no direct legal effect, it would have important political consequences relating to the Union and the UK Parliament, because a clear vote in favour of independence would strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the independence movement. The court also rejected the argument that the principle of self determination in international law gave Scotland a right to hold a referendum, because that principle applies only to colonies, oppressed peoples and similar situations.

Related cases on conventions, ministers and devolution

Studying public law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions