Quin & Axtens Ltd v Salmon

Where the articles give a director a power of veto over certain decisions, the shareholders cannot override it by an ordinary resolution.

Citation
[1909] AC 442
Court
House of Lords
Year
1909
Subject
Company Law
Topic
The company's constitution and decision making

Facts

The articles of Quin & Axtens gave the management of the business to the directors, but provided that no resolution of the directors to buy or lease certain properties would be valid if either of the two managing directors, Mr Salmon and Mr Axtens, dissented. Mr Salmon dissented from a resolution to acquire certain premises. The shareholders then passed an ordinary resolution in general meeting to acquire the premises. Mr Salmon sought an injunction.

Legal principle

The House of Lords held that the shareholders' resolution was invalid, and granted the injunction. The articles were a contract by which the members had agreed that the directors should manage the company, subject to Mr Salmon's veto. The members could not override the articles by an ordinary resolution, but could only change them by a special resolution altering the articles. The decision reflects the principle that the division of powers between the board and the general meeting depends on the articles.

Related cases on the company's constitution and decision making

Studying company law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions