Prosecutor v Tadić

The ICTY held that it was lawfully established, defined an armed conflict, extended war crimes to internal conflicts, and adopted an overall control test for when a state is responsible for armed groups.

Citation
Case No IT-94-1-AR72 (1995) and IT-94-1-A (1999)
Court
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Appeals Chamber)
Year
1995
Subject
Public International Law
Topic
Use of force, armed conflict and international criminal law

Facts

Duško Tadić, a Bosnian Serb, was the first person to be tried by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, established by the United Nations Security Council in 1993. He was charged with crimes committed against Bosnian Muslims in the Prijedor region in 1992. He challenged the jurisdiction of the tribunal, arguing that the Security Council had no power to establish it, and that the conflict in Bosnia was an internal conflict to which the law of war crimes did not apply.

Legal principle

In its 1995 decision on jurisdiction, the Appeals Chamber held that the Security Council had power to establish the tribunal under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, and that an armed conflict exists whenever there is a resort to armed force between states or protracted armed violence between governmental authorities and organised armed groups or between such groups within a state. Violations of the laws and customs of war could be committed in internal as well as international armed conflicts. In its 1999 judgment on the merits, the Appeals Chamber held that the conflict was international, because the Bosnian Serb forces were under the overall control of Yugoslavia, adopting a less demanding test than the effective control test in Nicaragua. The International Court of Justice later declined to apply the overall control test to state responsibility.

Related cases on use of force, armed conflict and international criminal law

Studying public international law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions