Paradine v Jane

The old rule of absolute contracts: a party who undertakes an obligation is bound to perform it whatever happens.

Citation
(1647) Aleyn 26
Court
Court of King's Bench
Year
1647
Subject
Contract Law
Topic
Frustration

Facts

During the English Civil War, Paradine leased land to Jane. Prince Rupert, commanding a Royalist army, invaded the land and expelled Jane, keeping him out of possession for about three years. Paradine sued for the rent for that period. Jane argued that he should not have to pay rent for land he had been prevented from occupying by the King's enemies.

Legal principle

The court held that Jane had to pay the rent. Where a party by his own contract creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, notwithstanding any accident by inevitable necessity, because he might have provided against it by his contract. Jane had undertaken an absolute obligation to pay rent and could not escape it because of events outside his control. The rule of absolute contracts was later relaxed by the doctrine of frustration, beginning with Taylor v Caldwell.

Related cases on frustration

Studying contract law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions