Owners of the Motor Vessel Tojo Maru v NV Bureau Wijsmuller (The Tojo Maru)

A salvor who negligently causes damage to the salved property in the course of salvage operations is liable for that damage, and may have to set it off against the salvage reward.

Citation
[1972] AC 242
Court
House of Lords
Year
1972
Subject
Shipping and Maritime Law
Topic
Salvage, general average, collisions, arrest and limitation

Facts

The Tojo Maru, a tanker, was damaged in a collision in the Persian Gulf, and salvors were engaged under a Lloyd's Open Form agreement. During the salvage, the salvors' chief diver, contrary to instructions, fired a bolt into the ship's plating, which caused an explosion and fire that seriously damaged the ship. The salvage was nevertheless successful. The salvors claimed a salvage reward, and the owners counterclaimed for the damage caused by the explosion.

Legal principle

The House of Lords held that the salvors were liable for the damage caused by the negligence of their diver, and that the owners could counterclaim for damages exceeding the salvage reward. The House rejected the argument that a salvor whose services were on balance beneficial could not be liable for damage caused by negligence in the course of the services, and that the only effect of negligence was to reduce the reward. A salvor owes a duty of care to the owners of the salved property, and is liable for breach of that duty in the ordinary way. The salvors were also unable to limit their liability under the Merchant Shipping Acts, because the diver was not acting in the management of a ship.

Related cases on salvage, general average, collisions, arrest and limitation

Studying shipping and maritime law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions