Lyckeskog

A national court whose decisions can be appealed only with permission from a higher court is not a court of last instance, because the higher court can refer when deciding whether to grant permission.

Citation
Case C-99/00, [2002] ECR I-4839
Court
Court of Justice of the European Union
Year
2002
Subject
EU Law
Topic
Preliminary references

Facts

Mr Lyckeskog was prosecuted in Sweden for attempting to import a large quantity of rice from Norway without paying customs duty. He argued that he had imported it for his personal use, under EU rules. He appealed to the Swedish Court of Appeal, whose decisions could be appealed to the Supreme Court only if the Supreme Court gave permission. The Court of Appeal asked the Court of Justice whether it was a court of last instance, obliged to refer.

Legal principle

The Court of Justice held that the Court of Appeal was not a court of last instance. Decisions of a national appellate court which can be challenged by the parties before a supreme court are not decisions of a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law. The fact that the merits of such appeals are subject to a prior declaration of admissibility by the supreme court does not have the effect of depriving the parties of a judicial remedy. If the supreme court had doubts about EU law, it would have to refer at the stage of considering admissibility.

Related cases on preliminary references

Studying EU Law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions