L'Oréal SA v Bellure NV

Taking advantage of the reputation of a trade mark, by using comparison lists and similar packaging for cheap smell alike perfumes, can be taking unfair advantage of the mark, even without confusion or harm.

Citation
Case C-487/07, [2009] ECR I-5185
Court
Court of Justice of the European Union
Year
2009
Subject
Intellectual Property Law
Topic
Trade marks: infringement

Facts

L'Oréal sold luxury perfumes, such as Trésor and Miracle, under well known trade marks. Bellure sold cheap imitation perfumes, which smelled similar, in bottles and packaging that resembled L'Oréal's, although no one was confused. The distributors gave retailers comparison lists, showing which of their perfumes corresponded to which of L'Oréal's. L'Oréal sued for infringement, and the Court of Appeal referred questions to the Court of Justice.

Legal principle

The Court of Justice held that the taking of unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of a mark, under article 5(2) of the Trade Marks Directive, does not require that there be a likelihood of confusion or a likelihood of detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the mark. Where a third party attempts, through the use of a sign similar to a mark with a reputation, to ride on the coat tails of that mark in order to benefit from its power of attraction, reputation and prestige, and to exploit the marketing effort expended by the proprietor, without paying any financial compensation, the advantage is unfair. The comparison lists were also not permitted comparative advertising, because they presented the goods as imitations.

Related cases on trade marks: infringement

Studying intellectual property law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions