Lindqvist

Referring to people on an internet page by name or other identifying details is processing of personal data, which is not covered by the exemption for purely personal or household activity.

Citation
(2003) Case C-101/01
Court
Court of Justice of the European Union
Year
2003
Subject
Data Protection and Technology Law
Topic
Personal data, controllers and the scope of data protection

Facts

Mrs Lindqvist worked as a catechist in a parish of the Church of Sweden. On her own computer, she set up internet pages to help parishioners preparing for confirmation, and included information about herself and some of her colleagues, including their names, jobs, hobbies and telephone numbers, and a statement that one colleague had injured her foot and was working half time on medical grounds. She had not told her colleagues or obtained their consent. She was prosecuted under the Swedish data protection law, and the Swedish court referred questions to the Court of Justice.

Legal principle

The Court of Justice held that the act of referring, on an internet page, to various persons and identifying them by name or other means constituted processing of personal data wholly or partly by automatic means, and that the reference to the injured foot was data concerning health. The exception for processing in the course of a purely personal or household activity did not apply, because the information was made accessible to an indefinite number of people. Loading the information onto a page stored with a hosting provider in the European Union did not amount to a transfer of data to a third country, even though the page could be accessed from anywhere in the world.

Related cases on personal data, controllers and the scope of data protection

Studying data protection and technology law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions