Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A

Where a clinic mistakenly used the wrong man's sperm in fertility treatment, the man whose sperm was used was the legal father, and not the husband of the mother.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 259 (QB), [2003] 1 FLR 1091
Court
High Court (Queen's Bench Division)
Year
2003
Subject
Family Law
Topic
Parentage, parental responsibility and medical decisions

Facts

Mr and Mrs A, a white couple, and Mr and Mrs B, a black couple, received fertility treatment at the same clinic. Through a mistake at the clinic, Mrs A's eggs were fertilised with Mr B's sperm instead of her husband's, and she gave birth to mixed race twins. Mr and Mrs A wished to bring up the twins, and the question was who was the twins' legal father.

Legal principle

Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P held that Mr B was the legal father. Under section 28 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, the husband of a woman who receives fertility treatment is treated as the father of the child, unless he did not consent to the treatment. Mr A had consented to treatment with his own sperm, not with the sperm of another man, so he had not consented to the treatment that took place, and the section did not apply. Mr B was therefore the father. The twins would remain with Mr and Mrs A, who could apply for an adoption order or other order to secure their position.

Related cases on parentage, parental responsibility and medical decisions

Studying family law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions