Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard

In unregistered land, a lender had constructive notice of a wife's beneficial interest, because its surveyor's inspection should have led to further inquiries.

Citation
[1986] 1 WLR 783
Court
Chancery Division
Year
1986
Subject
Land Law
Topic
Registered and unregistered land

Facts

Mr Tizard held the legal title to the matrimonial home, but his wife had a beneficial interest in it. After the marriage broke down, Mrs Tizard slept elsewhere but came to the house every day to look after the children, and kept her clothes there. Mr Tizard applied for a mortgage, describing himself as single. The lender's surveyor inspected the house on a Sunday afternoon, at a time arranged by Mr Tizard, and saw signs of children but not of Mrs Tizard. Mr Tizard then left the country with the loan money.

Legal principle

Judge Finlay QC held that the lender had constructive notice of Mrs Tizard's interest and was bound by it. The land was unregistered, so the question was whether the lender had notice. Mrs Tizard was in occupation, and the surveyor's inspection, which revealed evidence of children, should have led to further inquiries, since the presence of children was inconsistent with Mr Tizard's description of himself as single. The surveyor's knowledge was imputed to the lender.

Related cases on registered and unregistered land

Studying land law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions