Halsall v Brizell

A person who takes the benefit of rights granted in a deed must also accept the burden of related obligations in the same deed, such as paying for the upkeep of roads.

Citation
[1957] Ch 169
Court
Chancery Division
Year
1957
Subject
Land Law
Topic
Freehold covenants

Facts

Plots of land on a building estate were sold under deeds granting the purchasers rights to use private roads and drains on the estate, and in which each purchaser covenanted to pay a share of the cost of maintaining them. A later owner of one of the plots, who was not the original covenantor, used the roads and drains but refused to pay his share of the cost.

Legal principle

Upjohn J held that the later owner was bound to pay. He said that it is ancient law that a man cannot take benefit under a deed without subscribing to the obligations thereunder. The successor could not use the roads and drains, which were granted by the deed, without accepting the obligation to contribute to their upkeep, although he could escape the obligation by giving up the rights. The principle, known as the doctrine of mutual benefit and burden, is an exception to the rule that the burden of positive covenants does not run.

Related cases on freehold covenants

Studying land law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions