Farrell v Whitty

The criteria in Foster v British Gas are not cumulative, so a body may be an emanation of the state if it has special powers given by the state, even if it is not under state control.

Citation
Case C-413/15, EU:C:2017:745
Court
Court of Justice of the European Union
Year
2017
Subject
EU Law
Topic
Direct effect of directives

Facts

Ms Farrell was seriously injured in a road accident in Ireland while travelling in a part of a van that was not designed for passengers. The driver was uninsured, and the Motor Insurers' Bureau of Ireland, a private company set up by insurers under an agreement with the state to compensate victims of uninsured drivers, refused to compensate her, because Irish law did not require insurance for passengers in such parts of a vehicle. This was contrary to an EU motor insurance directive. The question was whether she could rely on the directive against the Bureau.

Legal principle

The Court of Justice held that the directive could be relied on against the Bureau. The criteria in Foster v British Gas are not conjunctive, so a body may be an emanation of the state either because it is subject to the authority or control of the state, or because it has been given special powers by the state for the performance of a task in the public interest. The Bureau had been given that task by the state, and it had special powers, such as the right to require insurers to be members, so it was an emanation of the state.

Related cases on direct effect of directives

Studying EU Law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions