Dunnett v Railtrack plc

A winning party that unreasonably refused to consider mediation was denied its costs.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 303, [2002] 1 WLR 2434
Court
Court of Appeal
Year
2002
Subject
English Legal System
Topic
Civil justice and procedure

Facts

Ms Dunnett's horses were killed by a train after they strayed onto a railway line through a gate that had been left open. She sued Railtrack, the railway infrastructure company, and lost. When she was given permission to appeal, the court suggested that the parties should consider alternative dispute resolution, but Railtrack refused to consider mediation. The Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal.

Legal principle

Although Railtrack won the appeal, the Court of Appeal ordered that it should not recover its costs, because it had unreasonably refused to consider mediation. Brooke LJ said that lawyers have a duty to further the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules, including by encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution, and that skilled mediators can achieve results satisfactory to both parties that are quite beyond the power of lawyers and courts to achieve. A party that turns down ADR out of hand when it is suggested by the court may suffer uncomfortable costs consequences.

Related cases on civil justice and procedure

Studying english legal system? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions