Daniels v Daniels

A minority shareholder can bring a derivative action where the majority directors have negligently benefited themselves at the expense of the company, even without fraud.

Citation
[1978] Ch 406
Court
Chancery Division
Year
1978
Subject
Company Law
Topic
Derivative claims and reflective loss

Facts

The two directors of a company, who were also its majority shareholders, caused the company to sell land to one of them, the wife of the other, for £4,250. Four years later, she sold the land for £120,000. The minority shareholders brought a derivative action against the directors, alleging that they had sold the land at an undervalue. The directors argued that the claim should be struck out, because no fraud was alleged.

Legal principle

Templeman J held that the claim could proceed. He said that a minority shareholder who has no other remedy may sue where directors use their powers, intentionally or unintentionally, fraudulently or negligently, in a manner which benefits themselves at the expense of the company. The principle that a minority cannot sue for negligence by the directors, established in Pavlides v Jensen, did not apply where the directors had benefited themselves from their negligence. The case was an extension of the fraud on the minority exception.

Related cases on derivative claims and reflective loss

Studying company law? Our tutors help you understand and apply cases like this in essays, problem questions and exams. Request a quote or browse our law notes.

Back to all law cases

This summary is for study and revision and is not legal advice. Although our case summaries are checked for accuracy, we do not guarantee that they are free from errors or omissions. Always read the full judgment for the court's reasoning.

Contact Us

Enquire about our bespoke academic solutions